So by this logic, does that mean that any black American person who DOESN'T speak with a "blaccent" needs to be canceled because they are then appropriating someone else's culture? Is that also offensive? You know, it's funny that this is such an "issue" when I've talked to some Black folks who don't speak with a "black accent" and they were bullied and made fun of by other Black people for being "white." And would this issue also apply to other Asians who speak with a street accent? Because I know lots of Asians who grew up in the ghetto who speak street slang, or as you would call it, "blaccent"...or do we call it "Latino-cent" if it's Southern California street accent? Should Tommy Davidson be canceled then for speaking "white" because he was adopted by white folks? Or should he be accused of code-switching for TV sake when he naturally doesn't speak with a "blaccent"? Bottom line, at what point does this all stop? And where was this outrage when "White Chicks" came out? Or was it okay for two Wayans to go about with white-face and valley girl accents and make millions of dollars off it because "ha, funny." And do you really want to lay claim on a street accent as "black"? Black people speak with many different accents, yet you want to lay claim to one that is so stereotypical of street culture? Black people have culturally appropriated their fair share of Asian culture also. Should we rewind and cancel them all now? This argument is tiresome and I'm not even a fan of Akwafina. I went to a Last Comic Standing show and the main headliner does his entire bit like he's mentally challenged and slow, but at the meet and greet, he is totally not mentally challenged and speaks like a regular dude. If anything, that's even more offensive because he's using people with slow and mental handicaps as a gimmick. Where's the outrage there? Or does he get a pass because he was a Black comedian?